Academic Dishonesty
Keuka College expects students to fulfill academic assignments independently and honestly, including all matters related to Field Period®. Any cheating, plagiarism, or other forms of academic dishonesty at Keuka College will be penalized, with sanctions ranging from an F on a specific assignment to expulsion from the College.
Academic Dishonesty Definitions
1. Cheating refers to the use of unauthorized assistance on academic assignments. Unauthorized aid may include the use of printed material, equipment, personal notes or the help of other people. Students should assume that assistance should not be used unless it has been expressly permitted. It is the students’ responsibility to know the limits of assistance, if any, permitted on any assignment.
2.The faculty of Keuka College abide by the definitions of plagiarism offered by James D. Lester in Writing Research Papers, 4th ed., pages 95-96 (Glenview, Illinois: Scott, Foresman and Company). The following is reprinted with permission of Scott, Foresman and Company:
“Fundamentally, plagiarism is the offering of words or ideas of another person as one’s own. While the most blatant violation is the use of other students’ work, the most common is the unintentional misuse of your reference sources…”
“An obvious form of plagiarism is copying direct quotations from your source material without crediting the source. A more subtle form, but equally improper, is the paraphrasing of material or use of an original idea that is not properly introduced and documented…”
Student’s use of source materials requires them to conform to a few rules of conduct:
a. Acknowledge borrowed materials within the text by introducing the quotation or paraphrase with the name of the authority from whom it was taken. This practice serves to indicate where the borrowed materials began.
b. Enclose within quotation marks all quoted materials.
c. Make certain that paraphrased material is rewritten in the student’s own style and language. The simple rearrangement of sentence patterns is unacceptable.
d. Provide specific documentation for each borrowed item.
e. Provide a citation on the reference or works cited page for every book or journal that is referred to in the paper.
3. Other possible examples of academic dishonesty include:
a. Falsely claiming to have done work or obtained data.
b. Misrepresenting reasons for not completing assignments or taking examinations as scheduled.
c. Submitting the same work in different courses without the prior approval of the instructors.
Keuka College Academic Dishonesty 1
d. Forging a signature on any college document.
e. Damaging or stealing college documents and/or equipment from the library, computer center, classrooms, or other academic resource areas.
Although cases of vandalism against College property described above in item (e) will be adjudicated through the Student Conduct Code, they are also listed here as examples of academic dishonesty. After all, the damage or theft of academically related resource materials and equipment by an individual student severely jeopardizes the pursuit of learning and academic performance of others in the College community. Students found guilty of committing acts of vandalism against academic property transgress both the Student Conduct Code and the Academic Dishonesty Policy, and therefore are more likely to receive severe penalties for their violation of community standards, including immediate dismissal.
Instances of academic dishonesty
1. An instructor who discovers evidence of cheating, plagiarism, or other forms of academic dishonesty will meet with the student and orally inform the student of the suspected violation and the evidence upon which it is based as soon as possible after the offense is discovered.
This meeting affords the student an opportunity to present an explanation or defense and resolve to the instructor's satisfaction what may be a simple misunderstanding. After talking with the student, the instructor may choose not to pursue the matter or invoke any penalty. No formal charge may be filed against the student or penalty imposed until the faculty member has met with the student (or made a reasonable effort to do so).
2. If still convinced that a violation of academic honesty has occurred, the faculty member will charge the student with academic dishonesty in a written statement that (a) details the specifics of the violation and (b) clearly states the course penalty(ies) to be imposed.
The Provost or designee will function as the college's records manager for cases of acknowledged and/or proven academic dishonesty. Each case of alleged academic dishonesty will be handled confidentially, with information shared on a limited, need-to-know basis. All records will be placed in the student's permanent official records file in the registrar's office.
Student Appeal Process
A student may accept an instructor’s charge of academic dishonesty and the imposed course penalty(ies) or appeal the decision; a letter describing the incident and the supporting evidence will be placed in the student’s record in the Academic Affairs Office. However, if the student disputes the charges, then the student has ten days from the time the charge is received to submit an appeal in writing. In sequence, appeals may be made to the faculty member’s division chair, the Provost or designee (and possibly the Academic Review Board), and, finally, to the president of Keuka College. In cases where a division chair is the faculty member levying the charge of academic dishonesty, a student should appeal directly to the Academic Review Board through the Provost or designee.
At any stage of the appeal, the division chair, the associate provost, or the president may dismiss or reaffirm the charge based on interviews with all relevant parties and a thorough review of the evidence. If the charges against the student are dismissed at any stage of the process, all the parties involved in the decision will be informed in writing. All parties have the right to appeal any decision except the president’s, which is final.
To appeal an instructor's decision, the student sends a letter of appeal to the faculty member's division chairperson within five working days of receiving the instructor's written charge of academic dishonesty. After interviewing the student and instructor (and other relevant persons as needed) and reviewing the evidence, the chairperson will render a decision in writing within five working days of receiving the student's appeal letter. A copy of this letter will also be placed in the student's permanent, official records file in the Registrar's office.